<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Productivity Tools on ByF (BaiFan) · Daily Deep Think</title>
    <link>https://blog.baifan.site/en/tags/productivity-tools/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Productivity Tools on ByF (BaiFan) · Daily Deep Think</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <managingEditor>blog@baifan.site (ByF (BaiFan))</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>blog@baifan.site (ByF (BaiFan))</webMaster>
    <copyright>CC BY-NC 4.0</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 14:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.baifan.site/en/tags/productivity-tools/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>Prompt Optimizer: An Open-Source Tool for Better Prompts</title>
      <link>https://blog.baifan.site/en/prompt-optimizer-tool-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 14:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <author>blog@baifan.site (ByF (BaiFan))</author>
      <guid>https://blog.baifan.site/en/prompt-optimizer-tool-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- more --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Anyone who has used AI knows the feeling: with the same request, a well-written prompt and a badly written one produce wildly different results. The problem is that most people simply aren&amp;rsquo;t good at writing prompts — not for lack of talent, but for lack of a systematic optimization process.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I recently came across an open-source project, &lt;a href=&#34;https://github.com/linshenkx/prompt-optimizer&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noreferrer&#34;&gt;Prompt Optimizer&lt;/a&gt; — nearly 29k stars on GitHub — built to solve exactly this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
